Showing posts with label white slavery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label white slavery. Show all posts

Friday, July 26, 2013

WHITE HOLOCAUST



 

See this note for more on white slavery

http://asparksfire.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-irish-slaves.html


"Jan. 24, 2012

Every white schoolchild in America has heard of the so-called Jewish Holocaust, in which millions of Jews were supposed to have been murdered by white Christian Germans during the Jew-instigated World War II. Yet, few, if any, could tell you of the true holocaust, or holocausts, of the last two centuries perpetrated by Jews against the White Race, which has resulted in the death of over one billion white people, as we shall prove hereafter. The fact remains that even though the highly inflated "official" number of Jewish deaths during the so-called Holocaust is now officially below 3,500,000 (New York Post, March 26, 1992), the estimates of white Christian deaths at the hands of the Communist Zionist Jews in Russia are as high as 45,000,000, just since the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. Millions were starved to death by Stalin and his Jewish regime, just as millions are being murdered by genocide today.

Yet, few have heard of these horrors perpetrated by the mongrel Jews against the White Race. Their hatred for Christianity and Jesus Christ has compelled the Jews to institute policies of genocide, which are in force at all times.

Despite the inaccurate and false portrayals of Hitler and National Socialism by the Jews, it is the Jews who are the true monsters, the true murderous devils. Jews and their Zionist vehicle of Communism have been responsible for the deaths of millions of white people - men, women, and children. The majority of Communists are Jews, and it is a fact of history that Karl Marx and his closest advisors were all antichrist Jews. The antichrist Jews forced the Communist change in Russia by slaughtering millions of bourgeoisie (the middle class) who had no desire to be ruled by Jewish Communism. They began their regime with the vicious and senseless murder of the house of the Romanovs, aided and abetted by the king of England who denied the Romanov royal family political asylum. The Encyclopedia Britannica calls the slaughter instituted by Stalin "repressive measures to control dissent." One must dig deeper to find the real truth.

  During World War II, Allied bombing of German railways resulted in starvation of Germans. Needed medical supplies, food, and clothing were kept out of the hands of Germans, yet the Jews paint a picture of feasting Germans keeping food from the needy Jews. The reverse is true for the Ukrainian people under Stalin. A man-made famine was created by Stalin and His Jewish fellow-travelers to starve the people into submission while Stalin and his cronies feasted. The Russian peasantry, called "kulaks," were deliberately starved and liquidated by Stalin. The Ukrainians were producing adequate grain for their own use, despite the fact that Stalin was attempting to force the inefficient method of collective farming upon them. In 1932, Stalin procured about 50% of the grain from the Ukrainians, if not more, thus producing a so-called famine. Grain towers were filled with unused grain guarded by communist military units, while the farmers who grew the grain, and could even see the towers outside their own doors, starved along with their families and young children. The grain was stolen from them at bayonet point. There was no natural cause for the so-called famine - instead, Stalin was stealing the food from the mouths of white children, deliberately starving them to death while he feasted on the fruits of their labors, all with the approval and the applause of the Jew-controlled Communist party of that era. The Ukrainians were fundamentally devout white Greek or Russian Orthodox Christians. The Jews had coveted the Ukraine for centuries and their methodical liquidation, a euphemism for genocidal murder, was little more than so-called Jewish vengeance for the imagined offenses these Christians had supposedly committed against the Jews. The murder of these white Christian Ukrainians by the cruel and agonizing method of starvation took a toll of eight to ten million. It is small wonder that the Ukrainians and Baltic peoples greeted the conquering Third Reich as freedom fighters and liberators from the tyranny of Stalin and his Jewish regime of living devils.

Those Ukrainians who did not starve to death were rounded up and shot, beat to death, tortured, and mutilated, all in the name of Jewish Communism. But the greatest insult to the Ukrainian people is that committed by the Jewish American press and media even today. The Communists blamed the so-called Nazis for crimes which they had themselves committed. The hundreds of thousands of bodies said to be Third Reich murders were in truth the fiendish work of the living devil Stalin himself. What is worse is that even though empirical, indisputable evidence has proven these statements to be absolutely true, the Jewish American media continues to purposely misrepresent the crimes against humanity committed by the Stalinist Jews and blame the Germans for the crimes that the Jews actually committed. This fact alone shows a clear and demonstrable Jewish prejudice and Jewish control of the American media, so much so that it may be said that there is no alternative media in the police state now called the United States. You may say, "Well, Pastor Herrell, are you not allowed to continue to publish?" My dear friend, our feeble efforts and financial ability are but a spit in the ocean; a feeble effort that the Jews understand presents no real danger to their dictatorial monopoly of the media. As I said before, the New York Post reported the proven and truer figures for Auschwitz, showing that the Russian Communists and Jews had purposefully inflated the figures and lied. Today, the same old lies are being told in the public schools. The truth is totally ignored even though it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt as the actual truth. In other words, it doesn't do any good to rationally and logically demonstrate the truth and show the Jews to be vicious liars. They simply ignore such noble efforts and return to the lies they have been telling.

The truth is that the Ukrainians were placed in Russian gulags or labor concentration camps far worse than any labor camp ever run by Nazi Germany.

"Millions of peasants died of starvation or were deported and sent to forced labour camps" (A Concise Encyclopedia of Russia, S. V. Utechin, Dutton: New York, 1964, p. 120).

The Ukraine, a highly populated white area, was also experiencing at this time a surge in intellectual advancement and creativity as well as a strong desire for independence which was detrimental to the existence of the Communist regime in Moscow. Thus, Stalin instituted his final solution - forced starvation and death upon the people to break their spirit.

"The next famine, that of 1932-3, was created artificially by the authorities as a means of breaking the resistance of the peasants to the collectivization of agriculture ... the grain was removed from the countryside by armed detachments chiefly composed of internal security troops and Komsomol members" (A Concise Encyclopedia of Russia, S. V. Utechin, Dutton: New York, 1964, p. 175).

Of course, Stalin's real purpose was extermination of the white population. We now know that the phrase "breaking the resistance of the peasants" turned out to be a political euphemism to conceal Stalin's true intentions of mass murder. The conservative estimate for the number of deaths by starvation under Stalin's reign is 10,000,000 white Ukrainians, as reported by the Encyclopedia Britannica. Yet, other sources show the numbers to be much higher. Taking into account the full toll of Communism on the Russian people, the number reaches 45,000,000. At the Royal Albert Hall in London, on October 31, 1967, the numbers were presented as follows (let us remember that we are talking fundamentally about white people):

A. Russian Revolution and Civil War - 1,500,000
B. Civilian deaths in the Civil War and Ensuing Famine - 13,000,000
C. Murders of "class enemies" - 3,000,000 D. Famine caused by disaster of first Five Year Plan (installation of collectivism) - 7,000,000
E. Stalinist purges - 1,500,000
F. Labor camp deaths, 1921-1960 - 19,000,000
Total - 45,000,000

Another angering statistic is that of the drop in enrollment of school children in the Ukraine, while non so-called famine areas showed expected increases. Because initial enrollment occurred in the USSR at seven years of age, a dramatic decrease in enrollment was seen seven years after the initiation of grain stealing from the Ukrainians in 1932. In 1929, enrollment of seven year olds was 1,585,814 students in the Ukraine. By 1938-1939, the number had decreased to 985,598. Another famine area, Byuelorussia, showed a decrease in these years from 369,684 to 358,507 (Cultural Construction of the USSR, Moscow: Government Planning Pub., 1940, pages 40-50). Thus, in these two areas there was a total decrease of 611,390. This means that at least 611,390 children under the age of 7 years were slaughtered in this time period. We must also remember that there should have been a population increase, so this number is more likely over 1,000,000, and these numbers do not take into account those students who might be older or graduating but never made it through school because their young lives were ended by the Jew front man Stalin. Someone must be held accountable for those desks that remained empty in the schools of the Ukraine and for those teachers' positions that remained unfilled. The Ukrainian population of 32 million in 1927 decreased to 28 million in 1939. Thus, there was a loss of 4,000,000 Ukrainian lives, and this number would be augmented by the normal expected population growth. At an expected population growth of 4,000,000 we are really looking at a loss, at the very least, of 8,000,000 white Ukrainians.

A similar tragedy occurred in Ireland in the mid-19th century: the so-called Potato Famine of Ireland. The truth is that the English had in their possession enough food to feed the Irish, but deliberately kept it from them. Therefore the English starved to death or forced over 1,000,000 Irish from their home country. (This was only one of the most recent genocidal atrocities committed by the English against the Irish.) But we must not entirely blame the white Englishmen, for these events occurred under Jewish control. By 1868, the British had a Jewish Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli. This Zionist Jew was only able to gain this position of power because of the already established Jewish power base in English politics, industry, and banking. It was this Jewish power base that orchestrated the Irish famine, deliberately starving Irish men, women, and children in order to gain more economic and political power and to eradicate the Catholic and Protestant churches of Ireland. Their strategy for gaining power worked, for the Jews had gained enough power to make one of their own Prime Minister shortly thereafter, in a country that had once banned Jews from its borders.

Still, this is only the beginning of the holocaust of the White Race. The Jewish agents who pitted white man against white man during the world wars are responsible for the deaths of those men who fought, often not even realizing it, for the Jewish agenda. After World War II, German soldiers were taken prisoner by allied nations, and civilian women and children were rounded up and placed in concentration camps. Jews often whine about family members who supposedly died in German camps, yet millions of survivors are left to spread their lies. How can there be so many survivors if so many died? Yet, we do not hear of German survivors of Russian, French, and American camps. This is because there are so few. Eisenhower's quartermaster general, Robert Littlejohn, openly complained that he had no way to feed the 4,000,000 German prisoners in US care in 1945. Many of these prisoners had been transferred to the so-called "DEF" status. This status meant instant death for the bearer, and was a violation of the Geneva Convention by Eisenhower. American camps were compared to Buchenwald, and some were reported as having no food at all anywhere in the camp. Donations of food for the prisoners were returned to donors and rations were not distributed. (This despite the fact that the majority, 58%, of U.S. soldiers thought Germans should receive relief in the form of donations.) In August, 1945, Eisenhower placed the remaining German solders in the camps on DEF status, thereby signing their death warrants.

The end result was millions of German women and children being starved to death, in addition to 2,000,000 German soldiers who perished in the camps at the war's end. In the usual Jew manner, the public was lied to, and few knew of the atrocious treatment Germans were receiving at the hands of the Allies. (All this also occurred at the time of the Nurenberg trials, which have been called the greatest legal injustice in the history of America by United States Senator Robert Taft, son of President William Howard Taft.)

If the horrors of concentration camp existence so often portrayed on our televisions were attributed to the Russians and the Jewish establishment of evil known as Communism, then our television would truly reflect a far more truthful and more accurate historical picture of the atrocities that took place more than fifty years ago. The gulags were indeed death camps for the systematic extermination of white people. This was not the original intent of the Germans. Most of those who died in German concentrated labor camps died of dysentery and other diseases such as pneumonia, bronchitis, and things that were then beyond the power of the German army to prevent. If the Allies had not bombed the German railway system and practiced a scorched earth policy against the German people, then the vast majority of labor camp persons would have survived the war far better than the average German citizen. It is in truth the Jews themselves and their insane bombing raids upon Germany that caused the deaths of 2.5 million Jews and other people being held in German labor camps. It is an indisputable fact that the Germans were far more humane to American prisoners and to prisoners of all nationalities than either the Russians or the Americans. 88% of American prisoners held by Germans survived the war virtually unscathed and in good condition, whereas the exact opposite figure was true of the Japanese and their treatment of American soldiers. In their camps, 88% died or were beheaded as the Japanese played ninja with the heads of defenseless prisoners of war, especially during the Batan death march. Yet, the Jews have maintained an utter prejudice against the Germans in the United States. Meanwhile, they have embraced wholeheartedly the Japanese, aiding them to gut the United States of its economic power base and setting the Japanese up as the lords of American industry to whom an ever-increasing number of Americans find themselves bowing each morning as they go to work.

These are just the tragedies of the camps during and after the war. After the war, Germany itself had been divided into zones, French, Russian, American, and British. In the British zone, innocent women and children were being starved to death at the rate of 220,000 yearly. A type of reconstruction, similar to that of the American South, was forced upon the German people. The millions of deaths of white Germans were tallied as "other losses." The true number may never be known, as the American records regarding the prison camps were destroyed between 1947-1950's, and a similar story can be told regarding the other Allied camps, especially the Russians, who took almost 100,000 prisoners (including 24 German generals) at Stalingrad, and only 6,000 survived. Similar actions and many more crimes against the German people are documented in the book Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners at the Hands of the French and Americans After World War II by James Bacque.

We can only know that the Jews were taking the advice of one of their biggest frauds, Albert Einstein, who publicly stated that all Germans should be killed. The Jews used this opportunity to carry out their plans of genocide against the White Race. Stalin and Roosevelt even toasted each other at the prospect of executing German officers at the war's end; and today there is absolutely no doubt that these plans were put in place not only by Stalin but by the Americans as well. So-called war criminals, especially anyone who had been connected with the SS, were hunted down and murdered, particularly in the two and three years following the end of the war. Special units of death squads or hitmen were dispatched to kidnap, murder, or take into deserted wooded areas and murder, in far too many cases, innocent Germans. The Allied records state clearly and are even bragged about on national TV that such units were engaged in this demonic, so-called work. The exact numbers of murders committed by the US hitmen cannot at this time be stated for certain. Yet, we know that it was in the thousands, if not tens of thousands. So much for so-called "humanitarian" codes of human rights.

Other criminal acts of genocide were perpetrated by Jewish Communists against white Germans in Poland before the war. Numerous eyewitness accounts, by Germans and Poles, describe these acts in detail. Hundreds of pages of historic documents detail these crimes. Photographs also provide evidence. In fact, many photographs of Jewish Poles committing crimes against Germans are used by Jews as so-called proof of German "hate crimes"! The Poles did not limit themselves to starving or shooting Germans; rather, they openly brutalized them, beating them to death, disemboweling men in front of their wives and children. Children were dragged from their mothers and beaten to death by mobs. Women were raped. Men were arrested on false charges. Once arrested, most were killed or brutalized; the rest were released with death warrants. The Danzig German population literally begged Adolf Hitler to invade Poland and put a stop to the Jewish Communist atrocities against white Germans; but once again, the same old Jewish lies continue to persist on American television, totally misrepresenting the reasons for the German invasion of Poland. The fact is, Stalin had already decided that Poland would belong to him. If Hitler had not acted, Stalin would have taken all of Poland and murdered all white Germans. It is Stalin who was the true devil and aggressor. It was Stalin and his orders to the internal Jewish Polish Communist party that literally forced Hitler to invade Poland as an act of humanitarian mercy. Most white Christian Poles will be more than happy to tell the truth on this matter even today. The great Polish people have not forgotten what the Communist Jews were doing in Poland just prior to World War II.

As part of the Jewish plan for white genocide in Poland, German priests and clergymen were arrested and placed in camps. One priest reports:

"On Sunday, September 10, I asked the commander for permission to say a common prayer in the dormitory. The answer consisted of a flood of profanity and of blows with a club. The same thing happened when I begged to be allowed to minister to the sick and the dying. ... The camp guards received us with personal blows and took personal possessions from us; I was not even allowed to keep my New Testament. Our cells were quite empty; we had to sleep on the cold concrete floor" (Father Odilo Gerhard, O.F.M., personal testimony as published in Die Getreuen, 1939).

Priests and Christian leaders were especially targeted because as Christians they had supported the Christian National Socialist movement. Children as young as four months were killed by Polish hand grenades. Others were shot or beaten to death with rifle butts. A report on these Jew atrocities states :

"The most important finding arrived at in the investigations by the medical examiners is not to be found in the incredible bestialities, both physical and mental, as revealed by examination of the bodies. Even more important is the fact that in the great majority of the cases investigated, military weapons were clearly shown to have been used as instruments of murders" (Polish Acts of Atrocity Against the German Minority in Poland, Compiled by Hans Schadeweldt, Berlin-New York, 1940 p. 253-254).

They further write that:

"With indiscriminate thoroughness, people of all ages, from 4 months to 82 years of age, were murdered; and that even women in a very advanced stage of pregnancy were not spared" (p. 257).

Numerous official reports speak of Germans being attacked by Poles, murdered and beaten, while most of the women were raped.

"My father was repeatedly struck on the face and the body with rifle butts, then stabbed with a bayonet. Thereupon my father fell to the ground and as he lay he was shot six times before dying ... [Later] About ten men held me down, by the head, hands and feet while one of them raped me" (Vera Gannott, September, 1939).

"Together, they then succeeded in raping my youngest daughter. Thereupon, the two took hold of my eldest daughter and raped her too" (Hedwig Daase).

"My husband was shot in the shoulder and hit in the face with a rifle butt. He reeled but still tried to escape. He started to climb the fence, but was held back by a civilian. A polish soldier gave him another rifle-butt blow which knocked him out. A Polish lieutenant led me and the children back in the house. From an attic window I could see my prostrate husband. He lingered on for a long time. I saw him draw his legs up and stretch them; once in a while he would lift his hand. However, it was impossible for us to go to him, for he was surrounded by Polish soldiers and civilians. A Polish policeman stood guard at the fence. Polish women shouted: "The swine is still alive!' Towards evening, my husband was shot three more times by Polish soldiers. He had also been stabbed through the stomach with a bayonet ... The woman next door told me that he was still breathing the next day. My husband was tall and strong and only 38. Probably that is why he had such a hard time dying. He lay about eighteen hours before he was released from his agony" (Christa Gollnick).

None of these people had committed any crime. They were murdered by the Communist mobs and the Communist controlled army, simply because they were white Germans. Murders of entire German families and villages were also committed:

"The murder of the Beyers, Bromberg gardeners, is characteristic of the cases of innumerable German minority families who, on Bromberg's Bloody Sunday, fell victims to murdering Poles ...The murder is also characteristic of murder gangs recruited from recognized Polish Government Officer Organizations. These groups, acting with recognizable cooperation with the army, were guilty of hundreds of mass murders ... With brutal violence, the railway men tore Kurt Beyer, 11, from the arms of his mother, who was clasping him fearfully ... Stefan Sitarek, a Pole, found the bodies of Friedrich Beyer, his son Heinz, and of Thiede [Beyer's assistant], lying in a heap ... [he] found Kurt Beyer squirming and moaning beneath the dead bodies. Obviously, he was severely injured. Sitarek tried to help the boy, but according to his statement, was rebuffed by the authorities responsible for the transportation of the wounded. According to statements made by other Polish witnesses, the child lying at the side of the bodies of his father and his brother succumbed to his wounds late that morning" (Polish Atrocities, p. 106, 107).

Hundreds of stories like this one are recorded and documented, yet very few people have ever heard of these atrocities committed against innocent children and white men and women. Many more cases remain unsolved and hundreds, if not thousands, were reported missing, never to be found or accounted for. Once again, mongrelized governments, where hatred for white people prevailed, are shown to have instituted a bureaucratic, systematic execution of white people.

The list of crimes against the White Race goes on and on. Wars instigated and manipulated by Jew mongrels are responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of white soldiers and civilians. These include the American Civil War, World War I, World War II, and numerous smaller wars throughout the world.

These numbers of deaths of white men, women, and children are staggering. In the American Civil War, over 600,000 white men died. In World War I, 8.5 million white soldiers and another 10 million white civilians died. In World War II, over 20 million white soldiers and 25 million white civilians died. These are the "official" numbers. The actual numbers of both military and civilian deaths are much higher. But even with these "official" numbers, plus the 45 million white Russians killed by Jewish Communism, we see that the number of whites killed in the last 140 years by Jew-orchestrated wars is well over 100 million.

It should be noted that not only is the blood of Jesus Christ and these millions of people on the hands of the Jews, but also the death of their posterity. How many white children would the Beyer family have produced? There will never be another Friedrich Beyer, and his sons, who would have carried on his name and mind, were murdered along with him by mongrels who do not even have the right to life. This is true of tens of millions more white, Christian men whose names have been erased off the face of the planet, and whose names the Jews are attempting to remove from the memories of those white people who remain. The same Jews who proclaim the "never forget" philosophy are attempting to make the few white people who remain forget their white heritage and the Jew-created holocaust of the White Race and cause them to turn against even their own racist grandparents.

Many of these 100 million were the most fit and able men of their respective generations who were not given the opportunity to have children of their own. The 20 million white soldiers who died in World War II, had it not been for the war, would have certainly gone on and had children of their own. If we are conservative and estimate that each of these 20 million white soliders had only two children, and that half of those children married each other and had two more children, then instead of 20 million white men being murdered, we are actually talking about 100 million white people who would have lived in the last 50 years. If we make this number 3 children to each family, then we are talking about 170 million, 90 million of whom would be alive today. This number represents just the soldiers who died in World War II. If we do the same math for all those who died in World War II, plus go back another generation for those who died in World War I, and then go back two more generations for those who died in the Civil War, then we get the following results:


American Civil War
Generation 1: 600,000 (killed)

Generation 2: 1.8 million (children)

Generation 3: 2.7 million (grandchildren)

Generation 4: 4.0 million (great grandchildren)

Generation 5: 6.0 million (gr-gr-grandchildren)

Generation 6: 9.0 million (gr-gr-gr-grandchildren)

Total Killed: 24.1 million


World War I
Generation 1: 18.5 million (killed)

Generation 2: 54 million (children)

Generation 3: 81 million (grandchildren)

Generation 4: 121.5 million (great grandchildren)

Total Killed: 275 million


World War II
Generation 1: 45 million (killed)

Generation 2: 135 million (children)

Generation 3: 202.5 million (grandchildren)

Total Killed: 382.5 million


White Russian Holocaust
Generation 1: 45 million (killed)

Generation 2: 135 million (children)

Generation 3: 202.5 million (grandchildren)

Total Killed: 382.5 million

From these four sources only, we get a total of 1 billion whites killed, at least 535 million of whom would be alive today (this includes only the last generation, but certainly most of their parents would also be alive). 535 million is about how many white people are on the entire planet today, so that the effect of the above Jewish atrocities is that the white population of the world is half of what it would be today had these actions not taken place.

Today, this holocaust continues with the genocide of the White Race by mongrels and blacks, all promoted by the world Zionist coalition. Jews have incited blacks to openly hate and plan the murder of innocent whites. For example, a black college student at Penn State University, a major university, was able to freely write the following for his school newspaper:

"After looking at all the evidence there is only one conclusion: white people are devils ... I believe that we must secure our freedom and independence from these devils by any means necessary, including violence ... To protect ourselves we should bear arms (three handguns and two rifles, maybe an M-16) immediately and form a militia ... So black people, let us unite, organize and execute" (African Americans Should Not Trust Devilish White People by Chino Wilson, as published in The Daily Collegian, January 28, 1992).

Of course, there was no public outcry regarding this statement, although there is clear and explicit intent to cause people to commit murder. Has the FBI hired paid informants to entrap Mr. Wilson by selling him illegal weapons, or he is allowed to continue his daily activities without interference? Or maybe his activities will one day get him a seat on the Supreme Court in the Clarence Thomas position of the Black Panthers. Where was the media hype when this was printed? How can the Jewish media, which openly preys upon news stories wherein a black or mongrel is murdered by a white (even though the crime was not necessarily racially motivated) justify their silence over such a statement? The fact is that the Jews also desire the death of white people and therefore actively suppress such information to keep it out of the hands of justifiably angry white people.

Another instance of Jewish media silence occurred regarding Hulon Mitchell, leader of the so-called black "Yahweh sect." Mitchell repeatedly preached to cult members that whites were devils and must be murdered. He was fond of saying: "All over America, white heads are going to roll!" He then ordered his followers to kill these white people and bring their heads back as trophies. When one follower decided that he would have difficulty carrying the heads of his white victims through downtown Miami, Mitchell settled for an ear. From 1986 to Mitchell's trial in 1992, sect members would do just that - bring the fingers or ears of white victims to prove they were doing what they were told. Is it realistic to believe that such devoted servants have stopped doing that just because Mitchell was found guilty of conspiracy to commit murder? Yet, even though the murders of flagrant, antichrist homosexuals or black drug dealers receive at least two weeks of complete media coverage with regular follow-ups, this story was never big enough to reach the evening news.

The statistics prove further that whites are by far the largest victims of racially motivated crimes today. According to the Department of Justice, blacks kill twice as many whites than vice versa. These are only cases where the killer is known, and it is a well-known fact that over 50% of homicide cases go unsolved. Other crimes are no different. Blacks are 20 times more likely to rob a white, and 52 times more likely to commit gang robbery against a white. A black male is 900 times more likely to rape a white woman than a white is to rape a black female. One such woman, raped by a gang of blacks in New York, received much media attention when she was accused of being racist and a white whore for being raped. Blacks openly threatened the judge who provided sentencing against the blacks, and nigger newspapers published her name and broadcast it to all blacks who would like to rape her again. This could have easily been just another rape-murder victim if she had not somehow survived the beating that followed the rape. In short, a black is 103 times more likely to commit any crime against a white than a white against a black.

All these statistics are especially startling when one considers the fact that there are 6 white people for every one black and often a Hispanic or Jew who commits a crime is classified as white. Thus, though there are more whites than blacks in the United States, blacks and mongrels commit most of the crimes in the country. (We are also not considering black-on-black crime, wherein most homicides of black males are perpetrated by another black.)

Furthermore, in any instance where a white has committed a so-called crime against a black, it is immediately assumed that the crime was racially motivated. This is not so the other way around (assuming the crime even gets any media attention). The following is a news story from Orange County Register, December 11, 1991 (emphasis added):

"'Wilding' Attacks: San Diego police are investigating 50 unusually savage assaults that they liken to New York City's notorious 'wilding' attacks, perpetrated by youthful robbers for the sake of committing violence.

"Police said the young attackers are black and their victims, 46 men and four women, are white. The victims were attacked in the Hillcrest and North Park neighborhoods.

"'There is no evidence they are hate crimes,' Detective Steve Baker said."

Obviously, these attacks are hate crimes, as are the other thousands of crimes perpetrated against white people in America. One has to hold a person in contempt or detest that person in order to commit a crime against that person. All black crimes against whites are hate crimes. This is a typical reaction from the Jewish-controlled media, which promote that all whites are racists, while blacks are always the victims. In fact, the statistics point the other way. Any attack on a white person is a hate crime, as the hatred of white people is promoted at every opportunity. In fact, most blacks have an ingrained feeling of hatred of whites, and they believe that drugs and diseases like AIDS were created by white people to destroy blacks. Advocators of such beliefs include Spike Lee, Bill Cosby, and Jesse Jackson. Most blacks in general believe such nonsense.

Another heinous hate crime against whites is perpetrated by the United States' legal system, wherein predominantly black juries have often set free black criminals in the face of overwhelming prosecutorial evidence. Yet, white jurors rarely pass judgments based on race and do not typically set free criminals just because they are white. (Although non-black jurors have been browbeaten by the threat of race riots or murder to vote not guilty and set free nigger criminals.)

These hate crimes are but another part of the plan for the genocide of the White Race. More insidious criminal acts against whites include open discrimination against whites who apply for jobs. Jews cry for so-called diversity in the workforce, in the schoolplace, and in all aspects of society, while qualified whites lose their jobs to inferior negroes. Every time a white man loses his job because of so-called affirmative action or the desire for so-called "diversity", the mongrels are stealing bread from his family, thus perpetuating the holocaust of the White Race. This is observed also in acceptance rates at universities and schools across America, where the standards have been lowered to ridiculously low or non-existent levels so that retarded blacks and other mongrels (many of whom who are not even citizens of this country) can gain entry to the school or be awarded coveted scholarships, which really belong to the hard-working, highly qualified whites. These white people are then either forced to quit school or work full-time jobs in order to pay tuition. Others must delay completing their degree in order to work two full jobs to support themselves and their families. These and many more atrocities are fully documented in Jared Taylor's book Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America."


Thursday, April 4, 2013

The Irish Slaves/White Cargo

Ran across a couple of  books on White Slavery:  1. The Irish Slaves by Rhetta Akamatsu. 2. White Cargo: The Forgotten History of Britian's White Slaves in America

You can find them both on Amazon.

Did you have any idea there were Irish Slaves, well before Black Slaves?  Did you know that the Black were considered a much more valuable commodity, than the "paddies"?  Wonder why we aren't taught THIS history!?

Some excerpts:

************



"THE IRISH SLAVES

At the beginning of the 17th Century, in the reign of James I of England, England faced a problem: what to do with the Irish. They had been practicing genocide against the Irish since the reign of Elizabeth, but they couldn't kill them all. Some had been banished, and some had gone into voluntary exile, but there were still just too many of them.

So James I encouraged the sale of the Irish as slaves to the New World colonies, not only America but Barbados and South America. The first recorded sale of Irish slaves was to a settlement along the Amazon in South America in 1612. However, before that there were probably many unofficial arrangements, since the Irish were of no importance and details of how they were dealt with were not deemed necessary.

In 1625, the King issued a proclamation that all Irish political prisoners were to be transported to the West Indies and sold as slave labor to the planters there. In 1637, a census showed that 69% of the inhabitants of Monsarrat in the West Indies were Irish slaves. The Irish had a tendency to die in the heat, and were not as well suited to the work as African slaves, but African slaves had to be bought. Irish slaves could be kidnapped if there weren't enough prisoners, and of course, it was easy enough to make Irish prisoners by manufacturing some petty crime or other. This made the Irish the preferred "livestock" for English slave traders for 200 years.

In 1641, one of the periodic wars in which the Irish tried to overthrow the English misrule  in their land took place. As always, this rebellion eventually failed. As a result, in the 12 years following the revolt, known as the Confederation War, the Irish population fell from 1,466,000 to 616,000. Over 550,000 Irishmen were killed, and 300,000 were sold as slaves. The women and children who were left homeless and destitute had to be dealt with , so they were rounded up and sold, too.

But even though it did not seem that things could get worse, with the advent of Oliver Cromwell, they did. In the 1650's, thousands more Irish were killed, and many more were sold into slavery. Over 100,000 Irish Catholic children were taken from their parents and sold as slaves, many to Virginia and New England. Unbelievably but truly, from 1651 to 1660 there were more Irish slaves in America than the entire non-slave population of the colonies!

In 1652, Cromwell instigated the Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland. He demanded that all Irish people were to resettle west of the Shannon, in arid, uninhabitable land, or be transported to the West Indies. The Irish refused to relocate peaceably, for the most part, since they couldn't survive if they did.

A law, published in 1657, read:

"Those who fail to transplant themselves into Connaught
(Ireland's Western Province) or (County) Clare within six
months... Shall be attained of high treason... Are to be sent
into America or some other parts beyond the seas..."(1)

Any who attempted to return would

"suffer the pains of death as
felons by virtue of this act, without benefit of Clergy."(2)

The soldiers were encouraged to kill the Irish who refused to move; it was certainly not considered a crime. But the slave trade was so profitable that it was much more lucrative to round them up and sell them. Gangs went out to fill quotas by capturing whoever came across their path; they were so industrious that they accidentally captured a number of French and English and several thousand Scots in the process. By Cromwell's death, at least 100,000 Irish men, women, and children had been sold in the West Indies, Virginia, and New England. While most were sold to the sugar planters in Barbados, Jamaica and throughout the West Indies, some writers assert that at least 20,000 were sold to the American colonies. (3) The earliest record of Irish slaves in America was in 1620, with the arrival of
200 slaves. Most of the documentation, however, comes from the West Indies.

In 1742, a document entitled Thurloe's State Papers, published in London, opined that:

"..It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was
thus relieved of a population that might trouble the planters; it
was a benefit to the people removed, which might thus be made
English and Christians ... a great benefit to the West India
sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen, and
the women and Irish girls... To solace them."(4)

Note the chilling insouciance of the purpose stated for the women and Irish girls. . to "solace" the sugar planters. Also, to our way of thinking, the Irish were Christians, but to the Protestant English, Catholics were considered Papist, and Papists weren't Christians.

So for the entire 17th Century, from 1600 until 1699, there were many more Irish sold as slaves than Africans. There are records of Irish slaves well into the 18th Century.

Many never made it off the ships. According to written record, in at least one incident 132 slaves, men, women, and children, were dumped overboard to drown because ships' supplies were running low. They were drowned because the insurance would pay for an "accident," but not if the slaves were allowed to starve. Typical death rates on the ships were from 37% to 50%.

In the West Indies, the African and Irish slaves were housed together, but because the African slaves were much more costly, they were treated much better than the Irish slaves. Also, the Irish were Catholic, and Papists were hated among the Protestant planters. An Irish slave would endure such treatment as having his hands and feet set on fire or being strung up and beaten for even a small infraction. Richard Ligon, who witnessed these things first-hand and recorded them in a history of Barbados he published in 1657, stated:

"Truly, I have seen cruelty there done to servants as I did not think one Christian could
have done to another."(5)

According to Sean O'Callahan, in To Hell or Barbados, Irish men and women were inspected like cattle there, just as the Africans were. In addition, Irish slaves, who were harder to distinguish from their owners since they shared the same skin color, were branded with the owner's initials, the women on the forearm and the men on the buttocks. O'Callahan goes on to say that the women were not only sold to the planters as sexual slaves but were often sold to local brothels as well. He states that the black or mulatto overseers also often forced the women to strip while working in the fields and often used them sexually as well.(6)

The one advantage the Irish slaves had over the African slaves was that since they were literate and they did not survive well in the fields, they were generally used as house servants, accountants, and teachers. But the gentility of the service did not correlate to the punishment for infractions. Flogging was common, and most slave owners did not really care if they killed an easily replaceable, cheap Irish slave.

While most of these slaves who survived were eventually freed after their time of service was completed, many leaving the islands for the American colonies, many were not, and the planters found another way to insure a free supply of valuable slaves. They were quick to "find solace" and start breeding with the Irish slave women. Many of them were very pretty, but more than that, while most of the Irish were sold for only a period of service, usually about 10 years assuming they survived, their children were born slaves for life. The planters knew that most of the mothers would remain in servitude to remain with their children even after their service was technically up.

The planters also began to breed the Irish women with the African male slaves to make lighter skinned slaves, because the lighter skinned slaves were more desirable and could be sold for more money. A law was passed against this practice in 1681, not for moral reasons but because the practice was causing the Royal African Company to lose money. According to James F. Cavanaugh, this company, sent 249 shiploads of slaves to the West Indies in the 1680's, a total of 60,000 African and Irish, 14,000 of whom died in passage.(7)

While the trade in Irish slaves tapered off after the defeat of King James in 1691, England once again shipped out thousands of Irish prisoners who were taken after the Irish Rebellion of 1798. These prisoners were shipped to America and to Australia, specifically to be sold as slaves.

No Irish slave shipped to the West Indies or America has ever been known to have returned to Ireland. Many died, either in passage or from abuse or overwork. Others won their freedom and emigrated to the American colonies. Still others remained in the West Indies, which still contain an population of "Black Irish," many the descendents of the children of black slaves and Irish slaves.

In 1688, the first woman killed in Cotton Mather's witch trials in Massachusetts was an old Irish woman named Anne Glover, who had been captured and sold as a slave in 1650. She spoke no English. She could recite The Lord's Prayer in Gaelic and Latin, but without English,  Mather decided her Gaelic was discourse with the devil, and hung her.(8)

It was not until 1839 that a law was passed in England ending the slave trade, and thus the trade in Irish slaves.

It is unfortunate that, while the descendents of black slaves have kept their history alive and not allowed their atrocity to be forgotten, the Irish heritage of slavery in America and the West Indies has been largely ignored or forgotten. It is my hope that this article will help in some small way to change that and to commemorate these unfortunate people.

NOTES:

(1) John P. Prendergast, The Cromwellian Settlement of Ireland, Dublin, ?, 1865
(2) Ibid.
(3) See, for example, Thomas Addis Emmet, Ireland Under English Rule, NY & London,
Putnam, 1903
(4) Prendergast, The Conwellian Settlment of Ireland
(5) Richard Ligon, A True and Exact History of Barbadoes, London,
Cass, 1657, reprinted 1976
(6)Sean O'Callaghan, To Hell or Barbados: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ireland, (Dingle, Ireland: Brandon, 2001)
(6) James F. Cavanaugh, Clan Chief Herald
(7) For Mather's account of the case, see Cotton Mather, Memorable Providences, Relating To
Witchcrafts And Possessions (1689)"


*****************************




"White Cargo is the forgotten story of the thousands of Britons who lived and died in bondage in Britain's American colonies.

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, more than 300,000 white people were shipped to America as slaves. Urchins were swept up from London's streets to labor in the tobacco fields, where life expectancy was no more than two years. Brothels were raided to provide "breeders" for Virginia. Hopeful migrants were duped into signing as indentured servants, unaware they would become personal property who could be bought, sold, and even gambled away. Transported convicts were paraded for sale like livestock.
Drawing on letters crying for help, diaries, and court and government archives, Don Jordan and Michael Walsh demonstrate that the brutalities usually assoc"iated with black slavery alone were perpetrated on whites throughout British rule. The trade ended with American independence, but the British still tried to sell convicts in their former colonies, which prompted one of the most audacious plots in Anglo-American history. This is a saga of exploration and cruelty spanning 170 years that has been submerged under the overwhelming memory of black slavery. White Cargo brings the brutal, uncomfortable story to the surface."

**********************


Jews and the White Slave Trade

by Dr. William Pierce

Steven Spielberg's pseudo-historical film about a 19th-century mutiny and massacre aboard a Spanish slave ship, Amistad, and the subsequent trial of the Black mutineers is being praised by the reviewers. Spielberg, one of the wealthiest and most successful of Hollywood's Jewish film makers, is also being praised by his kinsmen in various so-called "human rights" organizations for using his propaganda skills to sensitize White, Gentile audiences to the horrors of slavery and make them feel just a little more guilty for treating non-Whites so badly in the past. What the film doesn't mention, of course, is that Spielberg's Jewish kinsmen owned many, though not all, of the ships involved in the 18th- and 19th-century Atlantic trade in Black slaves and, in fact, played a very prominent role in bringing Black slaves to America.

The film tends to steer one away from blaming anyone for slavery except White Gentiles. This bit of misdirection is interesting in light of the fact that Jews have been dominant in the slave trade since at least Roman times -- especially the trade in White slaves. Jewish slave dealers followed Caesar's armies everywhere -- into Gaul, into Germany, and into other northern lands -- eager to buy as slaves all of the captives of the Romans -- especially the female captives.

Jews have remained dominant in the White slave trade until the present day -- although during the Middle Ages the Christian Church tried unsuccessfully a number of times to stop them, beginning in the fifth century with an edict by the emperor Theodosius II against Jews owning Christian slaves. After being banned from owning or dealing in slaves by one emperor, the Jews would wait until the next emperor came along, then they would buy a charter giving them a monopoly in the slave trade. Then public outrage against the Jews would grow until another emperor would ban their slave-dealing again. Most of the time, however, the Jews were the undisputed masters of the White slave trade, and that is still the case today.

Interestingly enough, this fact was revealed in a recent news report in the Jewish newspaper the New York Times, of all places. The January 11 issue has a major article titled "Contraband Women" and written by a Jewish reporter in Israel. The article deals specifically with the Jewish trade in Ukrainian and Russian women -- although it doesn't label the trade as "Jewish." What the report does say is this:
Centered in Moscow and the Ukrainian capital Kiev, the networks trafficking women run east to Japan and Thailand, where thousands of young Slavic women now work against their will as prostitutes, and west to the Adriatic coast and beyond. The routes are controlled by Russian crime gangs based in Moscow.
What the reader must understand is that these crime gangs don't have a real Russian in them. They are entirely Jewish, but the agreed-upon subterfuge used by the newspapers in this country is to refer to them as "Russian" rather than as Jewish. Thus one reads in various news organs about the recent takeover of organized crime in many areas of America -- especially the East Coast and Los Angeles -- by "Russian gangs" and of the viciousness and cleverness of these "Russian" gangsters, but there is never any mention of the fact that they are not Russians at all, but Jews from the former Soviet Union: Jews like Mr. Clinton's supporter Vadim Rabinovich, photographed shaking hands with Clinton at a Miami fundraiser when he was illegally in the United States, as I mentioned in my broadcast of December 27, 1997.

The story of the exploitation of eastern Europe by the Jews is a fascinating and infuriating story. Throughout the Middle Ages and into the modern era they focused on profiting from the weaknesses and vices of the Gentile populations of Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and others among whom they lived as a barely tolerated minority. In addition to being the moneylenders, they controlled the liquor business and owned the drinking establishments, the gambling dens, and the brothels. A number of 19th-century Russian writers, among them Dostoievski and Gogol, have described their destructive effects on Slavic peasant society and the perpetual condition of mutual hostility which existed between the Jews and the Slavs.

During the 19th and early 20th centuries the Jewish trade in White slaves from these lands expanded enormously. It has been described by the Jewish historian Edward Bristow in his 1982 book Prostitution and Prejudice, published by Oxford University Press and Schocken Books in New York. Although Bristow's book is written from the viewpoint of one opposed to this Jewish trade in women, it is nevertheless enormously revealing. The Jews recruited peasant girls in Polish and Russian villages, usually under false pretenses, and transported them to brothels in Turkey, Egypt, and other parts of the Middle East; to Vienna, Budapest, and other major cities in the Austro-Hungarian Empire; and as far away as New York, New Orleans, and Buenos Aires. This Jewish trade in Slavic women naturally caused a great deal of hatred against the Jews by the Slavs, and this hatred broke out in pogroms and other popular actions against the Jews over and over again.

One would believe from the works of Mr. Spielberg and other Jewish propagandists that the hatred the Slavs bore against the Jews was based only on religious bigotry and that the Jews were completely innocent and inoffensive. One fascinating fact which Bristow's book reveals is that the center of the Jewish trade in Polish girls was in a little town called Oswiecim. The German name for this town was Auschwitz.

I don't mean to imply that the Jews were the only ones at fault in the White slave trade. Gentile politicians and police officials gladly accepted bribes from the Jews and in return allowed them to carry on their dirty business. And in the United States non-Jewish criminal elements such as the Mafia collaborated with the Jews or ran their own White slave operations. But the trade in White slaves from eastern Europe has been an exclusively Jewish activity for the last 200 years.

It is ironic that another Jewish enterprise, organized Marxism, put a temporary crimp in the Jewish trade in Slavic women. When the Jewish Bolsheviks seized control of Russia and Ukraine after the First World War, and of Poland and other Slavic lands after the Second World War, they clamped down on all capitalist activity, including that of their Jewish brethren in the White slave business. What they did instead was establish a huge empire of slave-labor camps, of which Alexander Solzhenitsyn has written so eloquently. Jewish slave dealers became commissars and slave camp bosses. And of course, they butchered their Gentile opponents by the millions. The time of communism was the Jews' time for getting rid of all of the Russian and Ukrainian patriots, who had hated them for so long.

Actually, some capitalist activity did survive throughout the communist years in the form of organized crime. Two excellent books on the subject were published in the United States, both written by Soviet Jews thoroughly familiar with organized crime in the Soviet Union. In fact, one of the authors, Yuri Brokhin, was a former member of a Jewish organized crime gang in Russia, where he worked as a pimp. His book, Hustling on Gorky Street, was published in 1975 by Dial Press.

The other author, Konstantin Simis, was a Jewish defense lawyer for organized Jewish criminals. His book, USSR: The Corrupt Society, was published in 1982 by Simon and Schuster. Both of these Jewish authors write quite frankly about the Jewish domination of organized crime during the communist years. Brokhin brags about it, in fact. He says Russians and other Slavs can only be ordinary criminals, depending on guns and strong-arm tactics, but they aren't smart enough for successful, large-scale organized crime; only Jews are smart enough for that.

A factor neither author mentions which was more important than smartness was the connections Jewish criminals had with Jewish communists in the Soviet bureaucracy. When Abe, who ran a prostitution and drug racket in Moscow, could count on his cousin Hymie in the prosecutor's office to keep him informed about police plans for raids, as well as a little covert assistance if matters ever came to court, he had a distinct advantage over his Russian competitors.

Eventually communism bled eastern Europe dry, and with the economies of the countries under their control on the verge of collapse the communists switched hats, declared themselves "democrats" instead of communists, and announced a return to capitalism. The Jewish slave dealers went back into business, and business was good for them. Other Jewish communists went into business too. As the economies were "privatized" -- that is, as state-owned factories and businesses were sold to private entrepreneurs at bargain-basement prices -- Jews used their connections with their now-"democratic" kinsmen in the bureaucracies to snap them up. Other Jews, who had monopolized organized crime during the communist years, remained as organized crime bosses but greatly expanded the scope of their operations. Often, the new entrepreneurs and the new crime bosses are the same people.

The richest man in Russia today is Boris Berezovsky, who since the collapse of communism has become a multi-billionaire by buying up banks, television networks, and newspapers from the government, with the aid of his fellow Jews still in the bureaucracy. Berezovsky speeds around Moscow in a bulletproof vest and an armored limousine, and anyone who gets in the way of his business interests has a tendency to get shot or simply to disappear. Second only to Berezovsky in wealth is another Jewish media mogul, Vladimir Gusinsky. Between them, Berezovsky and Gusinsky control most of the mass media in Russia. They also exercise pretty thorough control of Boris Yeltsin, Russia's alcoholic president, who is sort of a Slavic version of Bill Clinton, plus vodka. It was only through the support of Berezovsky's and Gusinsky's media that Yeltsin won his last election.

If you remember, Clinton and all of the Jewish media in the United States also were rooting enthusiastically for Yeltsin during that election. They all were afraid that a genuine Russian patriot might beat Yeltsin, in which case the Jewish control of Russia would have been finished.

After the election, Yeltsin appointed Berezovsky to Russia's national security council, but when some of the few media in Russia which still are independent publicized Berezovsky's connections to Jewish organized crime gangs, Yeltsin was forced to fire him. Yeltsin has made up for that, however, by appointing another Jew, Boris Nemtsov, to the position of deputy prime minister, one of the most powerful positions in the government. One thing Yeltsin never has done, however, is make any move to curtail the operations of Russia's organized Jewish crime gangs, which are running rampant through the country and displaying their wealth and power, while ordinary Russians struggle to feed themselves and keep their homes warm this winter.

And tens of thousands of pretty but naive young Russian and Ukrainian women are being swept up by the Jewish gangs -- called "Russian" gangs by the New York Times -- and shipped off to a life of misery and degradation in Turkey, Pakistan, Thailand, and Israel, as well as to countries in western Europe, where Jews also control organized crime. The young women, unable to find work in Russia, Ukraine, or Poland and facing a bleak future in countries ravaged by decades of communism, are eager for any chance at a better life. They respond to advertisements that offer them work abroad as receptionists or secretaries and also promise free training and transportation. When the girls arrive at their destinations, however, they find something quite different -- but by then it is too late.

One of these girls, Irina, a 21-year-old, green-eyed Ukrainian blond, was interviewed in Israel. She told how her Israeli employer took her to a brothel soon after her arrival in Israel. He took her passport away from her, burned it before her eyes, and told her that she now was his property and must work in the brothel. When Irina refused, she was beaten and raped. Luckier than most of the Slavic women lured to Israel, Irina eventually was swept up in a police raid and sent to prison as an illegal alien. She was awaiting deportation, along with hundreds of other Russian and Ukrainian women, when she was interviewed. She lamented the fact that the Israeli who had raped her and forced her to work in the brothel was not even arrested. Indeed, according to Jewish law, the rape of a Gentile woman is not illegal. Nor is it illegal in Israel to buy and sell slaves, so long as the slaves are not Jewish. Amazingly, the New York Times article reveals this fact.
The White slave trade is big business in Israel. Ukrainian authorities estimate that as many as 40,000 Ukrainian women under the age of 30 are taken from Ukraine each year. Some of these women respond to advertisements promising employment abroad, like Irina did, and some are simply kidnapped and smuggled out of the country. Those who try to escape from their Jewish captors are treated brutally. Often they are butchered in front of other captive women to keep the others terrified into doing whatever they are told. At slave markets operated by the Jewish gangs in Italy young Slavic women are stripped, put on blocks, and auctioned off to brothel owners.

The most astounding thing about this whole, filthy business is that most people are forced to learn about it from a Jewish newspaper like the New York Times. And really, you should read for yourself the article to which I referred. It was in the January 11, 1998, issue, and the news is not likely to be repeated.
Ask yourself, why doesn't Interpol, the international police agency, do something to put a stop to this White slave trade? Why don't the governments of the countries from which the women are being abducted do something? Why don't the mass media raise a hue and cry? Why don't powerful feminist organizations demand the eradication of White slavery?

And the answer to all of these questions is easy: they dare not do or say anything because it is a Jewish business. In places like Germany, where the Jews have almost total control of organized crime, anyone who announces that fact publicly will be arrested and charged with "inciting racial hatred." Germany and most other European countries have laws against what they call "hate speech." Saying anything negative about Jews, true or not, invokes these laws.

Jewish organizations -- and of course, the Clinton administration -- would like very much to have similar laws in the United States. Interpol, which has plenty of other work to keep it busy, is not eager to be charged with "anti-Semitism" by going after the Jewish White-slave gangs. Even if Interpol did arrest the gangsters, it wouldn't do much good, because the fix is in nearly everywhere. There's a huge amount of money made from selling women: enough money to pay off politicians, bureaucrats, judges, and policemen.

Jews like to say about the so-called "Holocaust" of the Second World War, "Never again." They like to talk about how it is necessary to stamp out anti-Semitism and pass laws against so-called "hate speech," so that there can never be another "Holocaust." But by their own behavior they guarantee that there will be.
While some Jews beat the drums for more reparations payments from Switzerland, Germany, France, and other countries they claim didn't treat them right or took some of their ill-gotten gold from them 55 or 60 years ago, other Jews are still bleeding countries like Poland, Ukraine, Russia, and the Baltic nations of money and of their young women. Countries which suffered for decades under the brutal rule of communist commissars are still being exploited by the same people, now calling themselves "democrats."

The Jews believe that with their deathgrip on the mass media nearly everywhere, with their puppets -- like Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin -- in positions of power in the East and in the West, with the enormous wealth they have at their disposal, and with so many Gentiles buffaloed by "Holocaust" propaganda of the sort cranked out by Steven Spielberg and a hundred others, they can keep getting away with their exploitation of us forever. But they are wrong. They themselves are building up the hatred and the resentment and the rage which will destroy them. It will destroy them all: the gang members, the media bosses, the "advisers" to Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin, the professional "Holocaust" wailers, the former commissars, and the rest, even those who are not currently involved in any of these activities. They are guaranteeing that there will be another "Holocaust." And this time it will be a real one.

Thanks for being with me again today -- and do find and read that article on the White slave trade in the January 11, 1998, New York Times.
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs982a.html